![]() ![]() Physical implementation of protected qubits. Investigating surface loss effects in superconducting transmon qubits. Protecting superconducting qubits from radiation. Surface participation and dielectric loss in superconducting qubits. in Fundamentals and Frontiers of the Josephson Effect (ed. ![]() Quantum information processing with superconducting circuits: a review. A quantum engineers guide to superconducting qubits. Superconducting qubits: current state of play. Quantum bits with Josephson junctions (review article). Quantum-state engineering with Josephson-junction devices. The current-phase relation in Josephson junctions. Principles of Superconductive Devices and Circuits 2nd edn (Prentice Hall, 1998). Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box. Quantum Josephson junction circuits and the dawn of artificial atoms. Energy-level quantization in the zero-voltage state of a current-biased Josephson junction. Introduction to Superconductivity 2nd edn (Dover, 2004). Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box. Superconducting circuits for quantum information: an outlook. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Quantum error correction for quantum memories. Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical. Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy (Cambridge Univ. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Quantum Computing: An Applied Approach (Springer, 2019).īell, J. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information 10th anniversary edn (Cambridge Univ. The trade-offs between simple qubit primitives based on a single Josephson tunnel junction and more complex designs that use additional circuit elements, or new junction modalities, to reduce sensitivity to local noise sources are discussed, particularly in the context of materials optimization strategies for each architecture. The proposed microscopic mechanisms associated with these imperfections are summarized, and directions for future research are discussed. In this Review, the major sources of decoherence in superconducting qubits are identified through an exploration of seminal qubit and resonator experiments. In approaches to quantum computation based on superconducting circuits, as one goes from bulk materials to functional devices, amorphous films and non-equilibrium excitations - electronic and phononic - are introduced, leading to dissipation and fluctuations that limit the computational power of state-of-the-art qubits and processors. Interpretations of quantum mechanics and in addressing foundational questions.Advances in materials science and engineering have played a central role in the development of classical computers and will undoubtedly be critical in propelling the maturation of quantum information technologies. ![]() We also comment on the role decoherence may play in We survey methods for avoiding and mitigatingĭecoherence and give an overview of several experiments that have studiedĭecoherence processes. We review several classes ofĭecoherence models and discuss the description of the decoherence dynamics in Introduce the essential concepts and the mathematical formalism of decoherence,įocusing on the picture of the decoherence process as a continuous monitoring The theory and experimental observation of the decoherence mechanism. Of devices for quantum information processing. Quantum-to-classical transition and is the main impediment to the realization Download a PDF of the paper titled Quantum Decoherence, by Maximilian Schlosshauer Download PDF Abstract: Quantum decoherence plays a pivotal role in the dynamical description of the ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |