![]() ![]() I understand the main benefit of AfterShot is that it is much faster than Lightroom. If this is your first entrance into photo editing software, you might like the interface. There are many things I find that don’t fit well.īut I find the interface not as attractive or easy on the eyes as its competitors. Number one is they left the Windows-style folder icons and colours in the File System on the left. They are horrible and distracting.Īt the very least, they need to be muted, or, even better, adapted to fit into the same theme as the program. Adobe Lightroom created its own icons, which are not over the top. I feel like Aftershot 3 Pro was a little lazy here. The file system itself works, but it’s very basic. The next thing I find distracting is the terrible colours at the top of the window interface. These colours are labels and can be added to your images to separate in your culling or selection process. They don’t need to be so over the top though. It is supposed to bring your eye to the ‘Get More’ Modular Camera Profiles, but why? Next is that red star icon in the middle of the far-right of the interface window. ![]() This isn’t the most important area to draw your attention to. Camera Profiles aren’t as useful as the exposure slider or are so hidden that it needs to be pointed out. Unlike Lightroom and On1 Photo RAW which use modules, AfterShot Pro 3 uses tabs. There aren’t so many they become confusing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |